Why is it OK to blame, for example, muslim crimes motivated by Islamic teaching and culture on “Asians” or “youths” or in the case of CBC reporting on Rotherham mass rape and forced sex slavery of over a thousand children, “men”?
(I cannot find the article now, but about a year after the Rotherham rape gangs hit the news in a big way, the CBC finally covered it describing the mostly Pakistani, all muslim sex slave gangsters of children, as “groups of men”.)
This is just shifting the level of abstraction to one which lays fault where cultural_marxism wants it, and away from where it actually belongs, which is more often that numbers should allow, muslims.
A sort of amortization of guilt if you like, spreading it from many muslims, who do these things as a matter of religious, cultural and historical norms, to all men with the added bonus of making men as a group look bad. The one identifiable group that oddly, the group slander laws seem not to cover.
Meanwhile, and as a direct result, this keeps happening:
Because how are women, children or men supposed to make informed choices for their own safety when all information is calculatedly and pointedly untrue? A lie of omission is still a lie.
The leftist government media complex is making an omelette. It is an omelette of social paradise and the eggs are all the decapitated, raped, groped, beaten and robbed women who made the sanctimonious choice for lack of testable information. And we know how many eggs the last century’s communist tyrants broke to make this omelette, one which never actually came out of the pan, just by the way.