In a major announcement last year, the Trudeau government imposed a policy that will require all provinces to put a price on carbon emissions by 2018. As governments in Canada and elsewhere pursue carbon pricing, British Columbia’s carbon tax has received global praise as the gold standard.
Both the United Nations and the World Bank have declared B.C.’s “revenue neutral” carbon tax the model to follow. The OECD called it a “text book” example of how to implement carbon pricing. Commentators in Canada and the U.S have similarly hyped B.C.’s carbon tax, arguing it’s proof that governments can get carbon policy right.
One of the underlying reasons for all this praise is the alleged revenue neutrality of B.C.’s carbon tax. Revenue neutrality simply means any new revenue from the carbon tax is offset with new tax cuts to ensure there’s no net tax increase from the policy.
But there’s a fundamental problem with the B.C. model and proponents would do well to temper their enthusiasm: B.C.’s carbon tax is not actually revenue neutral.

Back in 2008/09, when the province first introduced the carbon tax, the B.C. government promised revenue neutrality. And initially it was. To offset the new revenue, the government introduced new cuts to personal and business tax rates and a new tax credit for low-income earners. The value of these new tax reductions was enough to offset all the new revenue generated from the carbon tax.
However, just five years later, as the carbon-tax revenue increased, the government no longer provided new tax cuts that sufficiently offset the carbon tax’s revenue. In other words, B.C.’s carbon tax ceased being revenue neutral in 2013/14.
This is certainly contrary to what the B.C. government reports in its official documents, which claim that the total value of tax cuts more than offsets carbon tax revenue. By 2013/14, the government was no longer solely relying on new tax reductions to offset carbon-tax revenue and instead began using pre-existing tax credits to give the appearance of revenue neutrality.
Carbon taxes will add up to an $865-million tax increase on British Columbians
In fact, a number of the tax credits the government now counts as offsets were first introduced in the 1990s — well before their inclusion in the government’s revenue-neutral calculation.
Once the pre-existing tax reductions are properly removed from the government’s revenue-neutral calculation, B.C. taxpayers endured a net tax increase of $226 million in 2013/14 and $151 million in 2014/15. Those numbers are based on historical data.
According to data from the government’s own projections, the carbon tax will result in a cumulative $865 million tax increase on British Columbians between 2013/14 and 2018/19. So much for revenue neutrality.
Horgan didn’t even try to mask his statements when he increased the Horgan Carbon Tax to $45 on Jan 1 . He said the carbon tax had nothing to do with CO2 and was just another tax that went straight into General Revenue.
The carbon tax (right across the nation) won’t make a dent in global emissions. It is purely symbolic. Even His Hairness himself has admitted that. Like its Godfather, “Climate Change”, the carbon tax is therefore nothing but a giant, left wing scam to enrich public coffers. October can’t come soon enough!
Scheer said he’s not going to kill the carbon tax, didn’t he? How will voting him in help? We need Bernie’s party to get voted in but that’s not going to happen. 🙁
Au Contraire Sing…
https://globalnews.ca/news/5407474/andrew-scheer-climate-plan-carbon-tax/
Excerpt: The plan, which Scheer has previously said will include cutting the carbon tax,
Scheer is namby pamby on everything, so as to offend the least number of voters. Fence sitting tube of goo would be the same way if he wins in October. It would be 4 years of utter inertia.